data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ed6f1/ed6f1baf142e88186a0967167f3cb85a298e6020" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6576e/6576ea4e70b7a5e70f05e9305034cad89ff6fae0" alt=""
Half of the original article:
The Armed Forces, on the other hand, are negative and write in a letter to the government that the proposal cannot be realized “without introducing vulnerabilities and backdoors that can be exploited by third parties”, reports SVT.
So that’s covered.
This has been explained so, so, so-so, so so so.many times. How is it still not understood?