• cubism_pitta@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Thats the concept of Sous Vide.

    You essentially vacuum seal the meat in a bag and then stick in water thats at 120F (just an example) and let it get its internal temp up to match

    You typically finish it with a sear. Some restaurants do this pretty heavily as it makes achieving consistency stupid simple.

    • Tikiporch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      120 would be very low for anything other than fish, which is sometimes cooked at an even lower temperature.

      Edit: not shitting on your example, just sharing.

      • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Pasteurization curves work at 120f for most things but most people would prefer a higher temperature because they want the protein denaturing and collagen breakdown that occurs at higher temps (resulting in a slightly firmer texture)

        • forrgott@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          The necessary internal temp is still strongly affected by both the type of meat, as well as known infectious diseases that will grow in different foods.

          Pasteurization also has very specific context…

          So, color me not convinced!

          • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            No you’re correct and I’m a dummy, it’s been ages since I’ve cooked meat. 130F is the lower bound for beef

            You can sous vide beef in some circumstances at 120 but this is the equivalent of cooking beef rare. If you do this you should either blanch the beef or sear the meat before cooking it

            The whole “cook meat as low as you possibly can sous vide” thing is dead anyway. All the cool kids have moved on to the new Baldwin curves that overshoot to speed up cooking immensely (outlined here: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GapkjSTx3Ao )

        • RBWells@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I have done sous vide steak and sous vide egg cups. Both very good but I can reverse sear steak and get as good a result; the egg cups though were incredible and I don’t know another way to get the low and consistent temperature. It’s like a warm water bath for them.

        • Pheonixdown@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Right, if you keep the water at the temp you want what you’re cooking in it, as heat transfers from the water to the food, you just heat the water a little more. Eventually, the food is entirely exactly the temp of the water, with no possibility of getting hotter, so the food can’t get overcooked even if it sits longer than necessary. Usually, you’ll quickly finish something after it’s done, like less than 1 min from sous vide to plate. It’s good when you have time to do the prep work but don’t have time just before the meal to do all the cooking, especially if you wanted to serve a lot of guests. Also, if someone likes food cooked to a certain doneness but is bad at judging it.