It’s a good time to note that this is the vaccine the autism bullshit stems from. If he was genuine in his views, this is the one vaccine it would make sense for him to oppose.
I mean sure, but would you prefer he stick to his views as children die, or do you want him to change his views and try to get MAGA crazies in TX to give their kids the measles vaccine?
I don’t typically point out that my opponent is a hypocrite if they’re doing the right thing for the right reasons.
Let’s assume for a second that the claims about the MMR vaccine had merit. It was specifically claimed that the cause was the addition of thimerosal as a preservative agent. Despite there being no evidence supporting this assertion, thimerosal was removed from nearly all vaccines decades ago. Which means that, if he was genuine in his beliefs, he shouldn’t have a problem with any of them anymore.
EDIT It appears the thimerosal claim wasn’t actually linked to MMR, as that vaccine never had it to begin with. My bad.
The MMR vaccine never contained thimerosal. There were two separate claims by antivaxxers. The first was Wakefield’s money making scheme to invent an alternative MMR vaccine by claiming the existing MMR vaccine caused autism.
The second, entirely separate, claim was that thimerosal in other vaccines was also causing autism.
The two claims then got conflated into a general ‘vaccines == bad’ by idiots like Kennedy, Jim Carrey, Jenny McCarthy and a whole quack industry of autism ‘cures’ such as chelation, HBOT etc.
Denialists are absolutely famous for moving the goalposts, though. That’s how they remain denialists.
Famous example is the evolution denialists always going on about a “missing link”. The minute some new transitional fossil is found then creates TWO MORE “missing links”.
It’s a good time to note that this is the vaccine the autism bullshit stems from. If he was genuine in his views, this is the one vaccine it would make sense for him to oppose.
I mean sure, but would you prefer he stick to his views as children die, or do you want him to change his views and try to get MAGA crazies in TX to give their kids the measles vaccine?
I don’t typically point out that my opponent is a hypocrite if they’re doing the right thing for the right reasons.
Let’s assume for a second that the claims about the MMR vaccine had merit. It was specifically claimed that the cause was the addition of thimerosal as a preservative agent. Despite there being no evidence supporting this assertion, thimerosal was removed from nearly all vaccines decades ago. Which means that, if he was genuine in his beliefs, he shouldn’t have a problem with any of them anymore.
EDIT It appears the thimerosal claim wasn’t actually linked to MMR, as that vaccine never had it to begin with. My bad.
The MMR vaccine never contained thimerosal. There were two separate claims by antivaxxers. The first was Wakefield’s money making scheme to invent an alternative MMR vaccine by claiming the existing MMR vaccine caused autism.
The second, entirely separate, claim was that thimerosal in other vaccines was also causing autism.
The two claims then got conflated into a general ‘vaccines == bad’ by idiots like Kennedy, Jim Carrey, Jenny McCarthy and a whole quack industry of autism ‘cures’ such as chelation, HBOT etc.
Ah, looks like you’re correct, I guess I got the claims conflated myself.
I found the problem.
Denialists are absolutely famous for moving the goalposts, though. That’s how they remain denialists.
Famous example is the evolution denialists always going on about a “missing link”. The minute some new transitional fossil is found then creates TWO MORE “missing links”.
The man has no moral center.