The first? I would have thought that would have been his incredibly unpopular and badly though-out rapid withdrawl from northern Syria, which turned the close US allies the Kurds into sworn enemies overnight by allowing the Turkish army to attack them, and handed multiple fully-stocked military bases to (guess who) the Russians - all while he simultaneously declared victory over the very much not-defeated ISIL/ISIS.

But that’s just off the top of my head and was in late 2018, so he had probably had major military blunders before then that im forgetting to be honest.

Worth reminding people that this is a guy who has admitted in interviews to owning a copy of Mein Kempf, had a cousin that gave him a copy of ‘My New Order’ (Trump’s collected speeches in English) which he kept in his bedside cabinet and was known to his then wife and friends for many years. And that the same cousin used to “frequently greet him” in the 1990s with a casual “Heil Hitler”…

All of this was public knowledge prior to his election wins.

I’m sure the similarities in Trump’s actions to the Nazi playbook are all just coincidences though right? And we’re all idiots and hyperbolic for calling it out? That’s what his supporters have always told me in the past, and what the right-wing media machine told them to say (Fox/Sky/Rogan/Shapiro/etc).

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/donald-trump-adolf-hitler-books-bedside-cabinet-ex-wife-ivana-trump-vanity-fair-1990-a7639041.html

https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/narcissistic-personality-disorder/symptoms-causes/syc-20366662

Hi, you took the time to respond i feel i owe you the courtesy of a reply.

Reading your website initially I could see a lot of pro gas-vehicle articles and negative EV articles, I didnt really focus on brand - not a fan of Tesla myself, and obviously the CT is a piece of crap. I’ll take you at your word that you dont hate EVs but I think if you got a few people to review your site they may also walk away from a quick look through it as ‘oh this is an anti-EV site’; lots of loaded language that’s positive to gas cars and lots of Tesla bashing. People are not going to read every article and notice that there are a few EVs that you’re very fond of before deciding if your page contains useful objective info or if it’s a just another biased source.

Regarding your About page (I’m on mobile), if I click the Menu button I get a drop-down that shows an ‘About us’ with a little down-arrow on it -> if I click ‘About us’ a menu drops down showing: drop us a line / best of / search / subscribe.

I checked each of those options and couldn’t find any info about the organization, or you the writer. Now you say you have an ‘about page’ so I go back today and I find if I click on the ‘about us’ drop down menu a second time, it opens a new page. Friend, congrats, you have made a secret About Us page. I have never seen this kind of design in a very long time browsing the internet.

Anyway, now that I’m here there’s no credentials or references (some mention of being published on other websites - but no links to those articles), beyond saying you have driven a few hunded thousand miles - and your name is still clearly a pseodonym. Journalists generally build faith in their audience by using their real name, it’s a red flag is all.

I hope that clarifies my statements, they were not arbitrary or intended to be malicious or unfair. Even negative feedback can be constructive and that’s the spirit of this message.

Um yeah I just perused the source website and agree. It’s got an obvious anti-EV bias in both article sections, headlines and interpretations of data. The only author they seem to have for all their ‘news articles’ is a person that doesn’t even have the guts to sign off with their real name, instead using the alias ‘Kay Leadfoot’. They don’t even have an ‘about’ page, just a contact form.

This is just the blog of some dude that hates EVs. Hot garbage source.