minus-squaremarcos@lemmy.worldtomemes@lemmy.world•Yelonlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·4 days agoIt’s a 90° angle for a reason. Changing to some random angle may have sense for some theory, but it’s not the Furrier transformation. And no, the waves have 0 width. The widths on the drawing are for illustration purposes. linkfedilink
It’s a 90° angle for a reason.
Changing to some random angle may have sense for some theory, but it’s not the Furrier transformation.
And no, the waves have 0 width. The widths on the drawing are for illustration purposes.