data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6056f/6056fb601eb23e2349ee09ed63d679cebe23d42d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1df69/1df69f53f5559e83c288e08b403109544e78dc05" alt=""
102·
16 hours agoIts the only way to make anonymous payments (XMR) in a world where everything tracks and spies on you. And it’s not only used to buy illegal stuff https://kycnot.me/ . I think of it like the TOR browser. Its great for people who are trying to escape an authoritarian government, but it can be used for bad things as well. But it should exist as I believe privacy is a human right.
How does this even make sense? The criminals would just move to another platform like SimpleX or use a VPN.
Whole article in English:
**The encrypted messaging app Signal is growing - now even the Swedish Armed Forces use it.
But the government wants to force the company to introduce a technical backdoor for the police and Säpo.
If the government gets its way, the bill will be passed in the Riksdag as early as March next year.
The bill states that companies such as Signal and Whatsapp will be forced to store all messages sent using the apps. Leaving Sweden
Signal - which is run by a non-profit foundation - has now told SVT Nyheter that the company will leave Sweden if the bill becomes reality.
She says the bill would require Signal to install so-called backdoors in its software.
But don’t you have a responsibility as a supplier to support anti-crime efforts?
Whittaker cites the 2024 attack by the Chinese state actor Salt Typhoon on several internet service providers in the US, where text messages and phone calls were leaked. She argues that a Swedish backdoor would open up for the same thing.
The aim of the bill is to allow the Security Service and the police to request the message history of criminal suspects after the fact. Both authorities were positive in the consultation.
But the Swedish Armed Forces are opposed and recently urged their personnel to start using Signal to reduce the risk of interception.
In a letter to the government, the Swedish Armed Forces wrote that the bill could not be implemented “without introducing vulnerabilities and backdoors that could be exploited by third parties”.**