data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ed6f1/ed6f1baf142e88186a0967167f3cb85a298e6020" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2f93/f2f939022ffae29e4decb326a98f4493d0a2e13e" alt=""
The “shit” you and I both were talking about was exactly that, not protests.
You’re the one that moved the goal posts and declared me incorrect.
The “shit” you and I both were talking about was exactly that, not protests.
You’re the one that moved the goal posts and declared me incorrect.
Great idea, cry wolf so that people who really can’t breathe are ignored.
Then I don’t understand your confusion.
My comment referring to a very specific “something” was in direct reply to someone very specifically not talking about protests.
Well then you’re supporting what I said, not proving it’s a lie.
If you fire someone you remove their ability to access bread and circus.
Less than perfectly, due to the constraints of the system they are forced to operate within.*
You are, of course, free to start up a news agency that fulfills every ideal you hold close, just know that you’ll have to have a lot of funding if you’re going to be spending as much time in court defending against libel lawsuits as you spend on reporting.
You mean remove the bread and circus? Definitely. But that’s not going to happen.
Otherwise I don’t know what you’re getting at.
It’s always incredible to see how so many people say they’re willing to do something is contrasted with the close to zero people who do it.
Yet here they are, reporting on it.
Yes, but it’s more certain and not much slower.