• Drusas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      You have it backwards. 100k in Manhattan is not wealthy, let alone insanely wealthy. 11k is insanely impoverished, even if you live in the middle of nowhere.

      • Danquebec@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I was living with about 10k CAD/y for a few years when I was single and I was mostly fine.

        Granted, this was in the 2010s. And of course I wasn’t in Manhattan, as you can guess by the currency.

        Now, I’m making about 70k CAD with a family (sole provider) and I’m just staying afloat.

      • HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I’ve had multiple injuries at work (and a few from sports) so am unable to do my former labor-type jobs. I’m also over 65 so retraining is out of the question.

        Worked minimum wage positions most of my life so have no savings and currently live in a rooming house.

        There’s lots of us out here scraping the bottom of the barrel just to survive.

        • NotSteve_@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          That really sucks, and I’m genuinely sorry you’ve had to deal with all that. $100K USD can be eaten up very quickly depending on your city’s cost of living though. I’d imagine someone making $100k USD in Manhattan would be barely scraping by as well

          • kaitco@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            100K in Manhattan is nothing. My father was a principal earning $150K and still could barely get by in the city.

            When apartments run total 40K annually, 100K is just a step above poverty wages.