In such a system, your primary focus should be on fixing the system.
If you’re talking about the USA, there isn’t really a way forwards within the system. It’s effectively rigged. The only way to gain useful power in that system is to work out of it. A vote is free, use it, but in a system that broken, that vote is almost worthless and cannot solve the problem.
The US federal election is a two-party system with FPTP, making other parties very very very difficult to elect and easy to demonize as a ‘wasted vote’ helping the worse of the main two parties to win. Both of the major parties benefit from this duopoly and have no interest in reforming the election to allow better parties to gain seats. The Democrats didn’t even doing much on removing voter suppression when they had the power to, there are so many easy wins they could make if they cared.
Consolidation of mass media under private owners, combined with the general concentration of wealth and its political influence, give the owner class effective control over which candidates are presented in a positive light and therefore more likely to be known and popular. You can’t make a federal candidate viable without the support of the owning class, and they won’t support a candidate who isn’t enriching them. The selections are rigged.
It may be a flawed democracy on paper, but when you account for the surrounding conditions, the people don’t have the power to choose their leaders. It’s as false as Russia’s.
I don’t know how things will be post-Trump, but up until now I’d say that (especially at the local level) it was very possible to field more left-leaning candidates and move the Overton Window to the left. We know this because the far right has very successfully shifted the discourse rightward, and a door can be traveled through in either direction.
Now, though, I’m not sure if Trump & co will even bother with sham elections. I suppose time will tell.
If you’re talking about the USA, there isn’t really a way forwards within the system. It’s effectively rigged. The only way to gain useful power in that system is to work out of it. A vote is free, use it, but in a system that broken, that vote is almost worthless and cannot solve the problem.
It may be a flawed democracy on paper, but when you account for the surrounding conditions, the people don’t have the power to choose their leaders. It’s as false as Russia’s.
I don’t know how things will be post-Trump, but up until now I’d say that (especially at the local level) it was very possible to field more left-leaning candidates and move the Overton Window to the left. We know this because the far right has very successfully shifted the discourse rightward, and a door can be traveled through in either direction.
Now, though, I’m not sure if Trump & co will even bother with sham elections. I suppose time will tell.