I strongly believe in the validity of my hypothesis (which every experimentalist does I guess), but I can’t find an explanation for the outliers, or the possible explanations are too many. Can I still publish with five good data points? How should I deal with the other five? I assume it’s unethical to not report them, right?

  • Poplar?@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Theyve edited the post, looks like they had a pretty reasonable question but wrote it badly.

    • Aatube@kbin.melroy.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago
      1. Post was edited three years ago. The answer I link to also responds to the update.
      2. Though it’s no longer insane, I don’t think the question was made reasonable by the update.