I think in the statement I was responding to, you could infer the chance being a percentage change, in which case my suggestion/correction would be valid. 1 could be valid if you covert percentage to decimal notation, but that just seems weird and unnatural.
And you mean 1 not 100
I think in the statement I was responding to, you could infer the chance being a percentage change, in which case my suggestion/correction would be valid. 1 could be valid if you covert percentage to decimal notation, but that just seems weird and unnatural.