• OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      It was a horrific story. Fortunately, it’s not actually true.

      Researchers have since uncovered major inaccuracies in the Times article, and police interviews revealed that some witnesses had attempted to contact authorities. In 1964, reporters at a competing news organization discovered that the Times article was inconsistent with the facts, but they were unwilling at the time to challenge Times editor Abe Rosenthal. In 2007, an article in the American Psychologist found “no evidence for the presence of 38 witnesses, or that witnesses observed the murder, or that witnesses remained inactive”.[7] In 2016, the Times called its own reporting “flawed”, stating that the original story “grossly exaggerated the number of witnesses and what they had perceived”

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Kitty_Genovese

    • OprahsedCreature@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      The problems that get left out of that story’s narrative IIRC was that she was inside her apartment building’s lobby. Like yes people should have responded (assuming they could actually hear her, most apartment lobbies aren’t built with acoustics in mind) but that’s way different from there actually being like 20 people in the street looking on as the Bystander Effect implies.

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        EDIT today I learned that the reports of witnesses and their inaction was grossly exaggerated by an unscrupulous journalist. So the following statement is almost entirely fabricated. My apologies. Comment left intact for transparency.

        38 people in her neighborhood admitted to hearing her and choosing not to intervene. They all gave different reasons for not helping.