• Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I flat-out refuse to do business with any that requires I use an app. I won’t even scan a QR code for a restaurant menu; that’s my cue to go eat elsewhere.

    • enkers@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I don’t mind the whole online menu thing. It’s probably an environmental net positive, but it’s bs if they don’t have ANY physical copies for those who can’t or don’t want to for whatever reason.

      If they wanted me to install something, though, that’d be a 100% instant nope.

      • tabular@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        An online menu requires power to be used (on people’s phones and the server). Is that really a minor contribution in comparison to printing paper and maybe laminating it?

        • taladar@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Considering your average printer is a piece of shit that needs to be replaced quite often, yes, using a website is probably more energy efficient.

          • timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            That and those servers are going to be running anyway. Powering a simple restaurant website is a grain of sand on the beach of internet usage.