• Dicska@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Thanks for the list! As someone who has never used any Twitter-like site before (I guess microblog is the right term…?), and recently made a profile on Bluesky only to support it (I have used it briefly ~3 times since joining): what are the pros of Mastodon that Bluesky doesn’t have?

    • wewbull@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Main one is that it doesn’t manipulate your feed with stuff “you might enjoy” so you can’t be easily manipulated by the people setting the algorithm. Of course, this is exactly why people find it hard. People want to be fed stuff and told what to consume.

    • realitista@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      As far as I can tell, the advantages of Mastodon over Bluesky are:

      • Well implemented federation
      • moopet@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago
        • No “starter kits” which are just positive-feedback loops for popular accounts
        • No “algorithm” which promotes popularity or engagement over quality or relevance
        • realitista@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Bluesky’s main feed is totally algorithm free, it’s just the people you follow’s posts in chronological order, same as mastodon.

          Starter kits are optional, but they allow you to get started in hours rather than months. For me, they made the difference between a vibrant and interesting feed well tailored towards my interests, and a very sparse feed that I didn’t use on Mastodon. For me they were the difference between a useful social network and a non-useful one.