Especially for the less tech-savvy among us?

  • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    As a centralized system, nothing has been shown to improve on Signal yet. For decentralized systems, I haven’t seen anything better than Matrix yet? SimpleX is slightly more secure, but harder to spin up and easier to break.

    Session… there have been multiple articles written on how it is flawed and untrustworthy.

    • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      “Harder to spin up”? Hard disagree. Matrix’s main server implementation is very resource-heavy, and alternatives like Conduit are not full-featured (and broke in some ways for me when interacting with mateix dot org). Meanwhile Simplex servers are pretty light and aside from a couple errors in the documentation that took a while to figure out, it has been easier than Conduit. And unlike Matrix, it has never broken for me so far.

    • Sonalder@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Matrix is not decentralized but rather federated and distributed. Also synapse (matrix sevrer) have poor performance, especially when you federate your instance to others.

      • Y5QcY2Cu9@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        What do you mean poor performance ?

        My synapse used to run on a 5€/mo VPS besides other stuff and ran fine and now runs on one of my on-premise servers (and not even my fastest, just some old ryzen 2700) with A BUNCH of other stuff besides it. Multiple users, a bunch of large federated rooms, bridges to other messengers … And it just runs fine with 0 issues.

        Are you talking about running a synapse server for like a thousand people or on absolute potato hardware or what is the issue ?