• Grapho@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Funny way of going about it, given that they’ve offered terns of peace every few months and negotiated a ceasefire that the US and its vassal the UK vetoed (hmmm 🤔) a few months in.

      Quote:

      When we returned from Istanbul, [then-British Prime Minister] Boris Johnson came to Kiev and said: ‘Do not sign anything with them at all; just go to war,’” Arakhamia said.

      Rather than report [the real demands] to the public, however, the media in Europe and the U.S. focused on sensational statements that were not actually part of those negotiations.

        • Grapho@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          15 hours ago

          They’re quoting people who were at the negotiations and when Johnson vetoed the deal, evidence doesn’t become more true or less true because it’s posted by a billionaire’s paper.

          But if you like, you can pretend NBC quoted an anonymous source who said it. Or just look for Arakhamia+“do not sign anything with them” and do your own cross referencing instead of sealioning.

          • RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            13 hours ago

            And Im asking for you to establish that those quotes are legitimate by backing them with a source that theoretically does not have a built in bias.

            Im asking for you to back your claim with a more valid source because People’s World is equivalent to Fox Cable News when it comes to built in bias

            • Grapho@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              12 hours ago

              All sources have a built in bias jfc. If you think you’ve seen an unbiased source that just means you’re not self aware enough to recognize that it’s just your bias

              • RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                12 hours ago

                Yes but your source has an inherent bias against the subjects they are talking about.

                Im looking for you to provide someone that backs your claim that isn’t anti-Western. If you claim has validity you should be able to find an less biased source or at least one that isn’t inherently biased against the West.