• FundMECFS@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    18 hours ago

    They were about as “neutral” as they were in the Ukraine conflict under Biden.

    They were selling loads of weapons at discount prices and supporting the allies in many ways.

    You’re right though that the US public was generally against joining the war, and the US as a whole, tended to be quite isolationist until Pearl Harbour.

    • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      They were selling weapons to both sides. GM controlled Opel until the 1940s, they built a lot of the nazi war machine (using forced labor), the Ford-Werke factory in Germany produced V2 rocket turbines among other parts, and US strategic bombers were specifically told to avoid bombing it because it was owned by an american, Exxon and Dow licensed patents for synthetic rubber and other war materials Germany lacked, Chase provided loans necessary for the rearmament, IBM sold the nazis the computers they used to carry out the holocaust.

      The capitalist class looked at fascism as the savior of capitalism; they’d been terrified of a revolution in Germany and Hitler had just shown them an alternative. There’s a reason he was Time’s man of the year in 1938.

    • juli@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      10 hours ago

      They were about as “neutral” as they were in the Ukraine conflict under Biden.

      Ah yes, and during Palestine conflict. They ultimately come out on top, it doesn’t matter if they’re funding a genocide. And people like you just spread around the “good”, and hide the actual heinous history.