You must log in or register to comment.
I guess the saying is literal now: " the right would eat shit if it meant the left had to smell it".
I said once that Trump could shit his pants, reach down and eat it, and magats would cheer him on and say “real men eat shit” unironically.
I stand by that statement
Countertop reverse osmosis systems look more appealing all the time.
Wow… What can even be done about this? I don’t want to bathe in and consume shit water :(
Basically, the EPA has been saying “we don’t care what you actually release, so long as the water you release it into is at least [this] clean” after you do it." With this approach, the city has to monitor the water, and they become responsible for whatever anybody dumps in the water anywhere, even outside the city’s jurisdiction. When a cruise ship dumps its sewage tanks overboard 30 miles up current, the city is responsible for that dumping, even though they have no jurisdiction over the ship.
The court said this isn’t acceptable. They said the EPA - not the city - is responsible for the water. The EPA must specify exactly what can and cannot be released. If they aren’t satisfied with the water quality, they have to tell the city to release less, and/or go after the other entities doing the dumping.
This ruling is much ado about nothing.
This is what you get when Nestle have a whisper in his ear.
Watch the price of bottled water skyrocket.
bottled water quality is less regulated than tap water lol
people don’t know that though, they think its safer.
