Summary

A federal judge ordered the Trump administration to release billions of dollars in blocked foreign aid within 48 hours, citing noncompliance with a 13-day-old court order.

The freeze, imposed by Trump’s Jan. 20 executive order, halted funding for USAID and State Department programs, affecting hundreds of millions of dollars owed to nonprofits and businesses.

The cutoff forced tens of thousands of layoffs and jeopardized critical aid projects. Despite the Feb. 13 ruling, no payments resumed.

This follows another case where a judge found the administration failed to unfreeze trillions in domestic grants and loans.

  • Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    Interesting. I suppose it being an executive order does keep it to the executive branch. It’s late over here and the brain hurts.

    Too bad there isn’t a law that requires the legislative brance to exercise powers of checks and balances. Maybe that’s something to note for America 2.0.

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      The federal courts took the first step, ruling the action unconstitutional. We’ll see if the DoJ dispatches the US Marshalls with a warrant for failure to comply. If not, they will be complicit.

      • DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        16 hours ago

        The courts can directly order the Marshalls to enforce their rulings. But yes,the Marshalls do roll up under the DOJ. So what happens when the courts give the order is anyone’s guess.

            • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              14 hours ago

              There hasn’t been one yet. It’s defined as a situation in which a major political dispute cannot be clearly resolved on the basis of the particular government’s constitution or established practice. All steps must be taken until our system has been proven to fail.

              • ubergeek@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                34 minutes ago

                You mean like when a person who organized an insurrection, and was found not eligible for office, still takes office?

                • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  18 minutes ago

                  I’m not saying he’s innocent, but he wasn’t convicted of having anything to do with it. That’s not a constitutional crisis, it’s a failure of our court system.

                  • ubergeek@lemmy.today
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    5 minutes ago

                    He literally is a convicted felon, who escaped jail only because he was running for POTUS.

                    That’s not a constitutional crisis, it’s a failure of our court system.

                    Those are one and the same.