Summary

A federal judge ordered the Trump administration to release billions of dollars in blocked foreign aid within 48 hours, citing noncompliance with a 13-day-old court order.

The freeze, imposed by Trump’s Jan. 20 executive order, halted funding for USAID and State Department programs, affecting hundreds of millions of dollars owed to nonprofits and businesses.

The cutoff forced tens of thousands of layoffs and jeopardized critical aid projects. Despite the Feb. 13 ruling, no payments resumed.

This follows another case where a judge found the administration failed to unfreeze trillions in domestic grants and loans.

  • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    The next step is the DoJ sends the US Marshalls to arrest the President for failure to comply with a federal court order. Let’s hope they follow through.

    Congress is not withholding the funds, so they are not committing a crime. That’s part of the reason for the accountability executive order, obscuring responsibility.

    • ubergeek@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      59 minutes ago

      The next step is the DoJ sends the US Marshalls to arrest the President

      The DoJ is owned by Trump, so I don’t think they’ll be doing that.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 day ago

      The DoJ is an executive agency, under the President, currently run by Pam Bondi and Emil Bove. Anyone in that organization who moves against the President is getting fired, whether or not that is legal.

      • perestroika@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        This is the interesting bit - he might try that. As far as I know, something changed in 1969 about the structure of the federal marshals, and the courts no longer hire their own marshals. A comment from an American well versed in law would help clear things up.

    • Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      Interesting. I suppose it being an executive order does keep it to the executive branch. It’s late over here and the brain hurts.

      Too bad there isn’t a law that requires the legislative brance to exercise powers of checks and balances. Maybe that’s something to note for America 2.0.

      • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        The federal courts took the first step, ruling the action unconstitutional. We’ll see if the DoJ dispatches the US Marshalls with a warrant for failure to comply. If not, they will be complicit.

        • DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          17 hours ago

          The courts can directly order the Marshalls to enforce their rulings. But yes,the Marshalls do roll up under the DOJ. So what happens when the courts give the order is anyone’s guess.

              • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                14 hours ago

                There hasn’t been one yet. It’s defined as a situation in which a major political dispute cannot be clearly resolved on the basis of the particular government’s constitution or established practice. All steps must be taken until our system has been proven to fail.

                • ubergeek@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  55 minutes ago

                  You mean like when a person who organized an insurrection, and was found not eligible for office, still takes office?

                  • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    39 minutes ago

                    I’m not saying he’s innocent, but he wasn’t convicted of having anything to do with it. That’s not a constitutional crisis, it’s a failure of our court system.