Summary

A federal judge ordered the Trump administration to release billions of dollars in blocked foreign aid within 48 hours, citing noncompliance with a 13-day-old court order.

The freeze, imposed by Trump’s Jan. 20 executive order, halted funding for USAID and State Department programs, affecting hundreds of millions of dollars owed to nonprofits and businesses.

The cutoff forced tens of thousands of layoffs and jeopardized critical aid projects. Despite the Feb. 13 ruling, no payments resumed.

This follows another case where a judge found the administration failed to unfreeze trillions in domestic grants and loans.

  • tamal3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    What is the date and time required by the judge? That is PROTEST O’CLOCK, my people.

  • Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Whatcha gonna do, judge? Ask again? Wait until deadlines pass? Delay has always been Trumpy Dumpty’s strategy to maximize harm. No conquences means nothing to lose.

    But instead of poking a dictator who doesn’t GAF, how about holding congress Republicans accountable since, you know, they “control” finances. You start dragging them out in cuffs, I betcha it will get someone’s attention, fast!

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      The next step is the DoJ sends the US Marshalls to arrest the President for failure to comply with a federal court order. Let’s hope they follow through.

      Congress is not withholding the funds, so they are not committing a crime. That’s part of the reason for the accountability executive order, obscuring responsibility.

      • dhork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        24 hours ago

        The DoJ is an executive agency, under the President, currently run by Pam Bondi and Emil Bove. Anyone in that organization who moves against the President is getting fired, whether or not that is legal.

      • Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 day ago

        Interesting. I suppose it being an executive order does keep it to the executive branch. It’s late over here and the brain hurts.

        Too bad there isn’t a law that requires the legislative brance to exercise powers of checks and balances. Maybe that’s something to note for America 2.0.

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          edit-2
          22 hours ago

          The federal courts took the first step, ruling the action unconstitutional. We’ll see if the DoJ dispatches the US Marshalls with a warrant for failure to comply. If not, they will be complicit.

          • DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            13 hours ago

            The courts can directly order the Marshalls to enforce their rulings. But yes,the Marshalls do roll up under the DOJ. So what happens when the courts give the order is anyone’s guess.

                • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 hours ago

                  There hasn’t been one yet. It’s defined as a situation in which a major political dispute cannot be clearly resolved on the basis of the particular government’s constitution or established practice. All steps must be taken until our system has been proven to fail.

  • lectricleopard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    What are they gonna do? Prosecute him? Impeach him? Hold him in contempt?

    Dudes been stealing from everyone for his whole life and doesn’t give a fuck what a judge thinks.

  • nomoredrama@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Or what? The judge doesn’t have the power to enforce it. The president has greater power than the judge. The judge shouldn’t even be involved to begin with. The executive order trumps the judges order.

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      you’re wrong and let me explain why.

      a judge rules with the force of laws. this is because they work within the judicial branch. these laws are written, voted, and accepted as truth. laws are practically stricken in stone.

      executive orders are orders given to how the government should operate, not how they will operate. without laws to back the EO the order is worth as much as an Arby’s receipt. they are not royal proclamations because America does not have a king.

      Trump and his bastards have broken several hundred if not thousands of laws all under the guise of executive privilege which has ZERO legal standing in court. and before you bring scotus into this, they don’t make the laws they merely interpret them and how they should be interpreted. it’s up to the lower courts and judges to apply or ignore laws as they have been interpreted.

      so to recap: executive orders are not laws, they cannot be interpreted by scotus and thus can be ignored or even challenged by the lower courts.

      as for what the judges can do, they can hold him in contempt, arrest him, and place him in custody for not complying with the law.

      hopefully you’ve learned something and can be less ignorant about a subject you seem so passionate about.

        • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          the US Marshals.

          before you even say it,

          blah blah blah “Pam Bondi” “Emil Bove”.

          get a new message, troll. there’s still Americans that are willing to protect the constitution.

      • nomoredrama@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        The judge can say whatever he wants. Do you think the secret service will allow anyone to arrest the President?

        • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          sure they won’t, then the marshals will arrest them for impediment the law.

          then we’ll truly and publicly be in a constitutional crisis.

          no one is above the law, NO ONE.